Radiographic Assessment of Features of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars With Post-Operative Injury to the Inferior Alveolar Nerves: A Record-Based Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61172/bz0gq141Keywords:
Impacted mandibular third molar, Panoramic radiograph, Inferior Alveolar Nerve injuryAbstract
Background
Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars (IMTMs) is among the most common minor oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures. However, it carries the risk of complications, including injury to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Panoramic radiography can predict this risk based on certain radiographic features, including root darkening, interruption of the radiopaque line of the inferior alveolar canal, canal diversion, dark and bifid apex, root deflection, narrowing of the IAN canal, and root narrowing.
Objective
To assess the prevalence and distribution of seven radiographic signs predictive of IAN injury during mandibular third molar surgery namely, root darkening, interruption of the white line, IAN canal diversion, root deflection, narrowing of the IAN canal, dark and bifid apex, and root narrowing and evaluate their correlation with clinical outcomes in adult patients.
Methods
This retrospective, cross-sectional study reviewed 258 panoramic radiographs of adult patients aged 18–60 years (120 males and 138 females) with 341 impacted mandibular third molars located in proximity to the IAN canal. Predictor variables were the seven radiographic signs listed above. The primary outcome variable was postoperative IAN injury. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. Statistical tests included ANOVA, chi-square, and correlation coefficients, with significance set at p<0.05. Data were presented using descriptive statistics, tables, charts, and graphs.
Results
The most frequent radiographic sign was interruption of the radiopaque superior margin of the IAN canal (n = 182, 70.5%), followed by narrowing of the IAN canal (n = 143, 55.4%) and root darkening (n = 105, 40.7%). Of the 341 IMTMs, 76 (21.4%) were surgically removed, and 13 (17.1%) of these cases resulted in IAN injury. Among them, eight had interrupted radiopaque lines, three had canal narrowing, and one each showed root deflection and root darkening.
Conclusion
The most predictive radiographic signs of IAN injury during surgical removal of IMTMs were interruption of the radiopaque canal margin, canal narrowing, and root darkening. Surgeons should carefully assess these signs preoperatively to reduce the risk of nerve injury.
Downloads
References
1. Kumar VR, Yadav P, Kahsu E, Girkar F, Chakraborty R. Prevalence and pattern of mandibular third molar impaction in Eritrean population: a retrospective study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(2):100-6. 2. Nazir A, Akhtar MU, Ali S. Assessment of different patterns of impacted mandibular third molars and their associated pathologies. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res. 2014;2(2):14-22.
3. Mukherji A, Singh MP, Nahar P, Balaji BS, Mathur H, Goel S et al. Predicting pathology in impacted mandibular third molars. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2017;29:20-4.
4. Shin SM, Choi EJ, Moon SY. Prevalence of pathologies related to impacted mandibular third molars. Springerplus. 2016;5:1-5.
5. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2004;62(11):1363-71.
6. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Estimating third molar extraction difficulty: a comparison of subjective and objective factors. Journal of Oral and maxillofacial Surgery. 2005;63(4):427-34.
7. Umar G, Obisesan O, Bryant C, Rood J. Elimination of permanent injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve following surgical intervention of the “high risk” third molar. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013;51(4):353–7.
8. Wofford DT, Miller RI. Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1987;45(1):15-9.
9. Alling III CC. Dysesthesia of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following third molar surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1986;44(6):454-7.
10. Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS. Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 1980;101(2):240-5.
11. Blaeser BF, August MA, Donoff RB, Kaban LB, Dodson TB. Panoramic radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar extraction. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2003;61(4):417-21.
12. Szalma J, Lempel E, Jeges S, Szabó G, Olasz L. Theprognostic value of panoramic radiography of inferioralveolar nerve damage after mandibular third molarremoval: retrospective study of 400 cases. OralSurgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, OralRadiology, andEndodontology.2010;109(2):294-302.
13. Verma A, Verma S, Dhankhar A, Moral NK, Nagar N, Bhadoria AS. Predicting the Risk of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury in Impacted Lower Third Molars Using Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2021;10(34):2910-5.
14. Tudtiam T, Leelarungsun R, Khoo LK, Chaiyasamut T, Arayasantiparb R, Wongsirichat N. The study of inferior alveolar canal at the lower third molar apical region with cone beam computed tomography. J o u r n a l o f c li n i c a l me d i c i n e r e s e a r c h . 2019;11(5):353.
15. Shaukat L, Khan ZA, Issrani R, Ahmed N, Ahmad M, Hazim FA, et al. Assessment of Panoramic Radiographic Variables as Predictors of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury During Third Molar Extraction. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2023;23:e220079.
16. Nakayama K, Nonoyama M, Takaki Y, Kagawa T, Yuasa K, Izumi K, et al. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2009;67(12):2587-91.
17. Sedaghatfar M, August MA, Dodson TB. Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2005;63(1):3-7.
18. Baqain ZH, Karaky AA, Sawair F, Khaisat A, Duaibis R, Rajab LD. Frequency estimates and risk factors for postoperative morbidity after third molar removal: a prospective cohort study. Journal of oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008;66(11):2276-83.
19. Bell GW, Rodgers JM, Grime RJ, Edwards KL, Hahn MR, Dorman ML, et al. The accuracy of dental panoramic tomographs in determining the root morphology of mandibular third molar teeth before surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2003;95(1):119-25.
20. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observeragreementforcategoricaldata.biometrics.1977;159-74.
21. Haddad Z, Khorasani M, Bakhshi M, Tofangchiha M. Radiographic position of impacted mandibular third molars and their association with pathological conditions. International journal of dentistry. 2021. 22. Quek S, Tay C, Tay K, Toh S, Lim K. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2003;32(5):548-52.
23. Yahaya A A, Kaura MA, Ogbozor BE, Olohigbe A, Ewansiha G, Bamgbose BO. Radiographic Study of the Prevalence and Pattern of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars in a Northern Nigerian Population. Nigerian Dental Journal. 2024;32(3).
24. Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Report on a ten-year study of a tooth division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery. 1942;28(11):B660-6.
25. Rood J, Shehab BN. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1990;28(1):20-5.
26. Kim HJ, Jo YJ, Choi JS, Kim HJ, Kim J, Moon SY. Anatomical risk factors of inferior alveolar nerve injury association with surgical extraction of mandibular third molar in Korean population. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(2):816.
27. Pathak S, Mishra N, Rastogi MK, Sharma S. Significance of radiological variables studied on orthopantamogram to pridict post-operative inferior alveoler nerve paresthesia after third molar extraction. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR. 2014;8(5):ZC62.
28. Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral surgery, Oral medicine, Oral pathology, Oral radiology, and Endodontology. 2001;92(4):377-83.
29. Renton T, Hankins M, Sproate C, McGurk M. Arandomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2005;43(1):7-12.
30. Xu G zhou, Yang C,Fan XD, Yu CQ, Cai XY, Wang Y,et al. Anatomic relationship between impacted thirdmandibular molar and the mandibular canal as the riskfactor of inferior alveolar nerve injury. British JournalofOral andMaxillofacialSurgery.2013;51(8):e215-9.
31. Ghai S, Choudhury S. Role of panoramic imaging and cone beam CT for assessment of inferior alveolar nerve exposure and subsequent paresthesia following removal of impacted mandibular third molar. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery. 2018;17:242-7.
32. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, et al. Acomparative study of cone-beam computed tomogr aphy and conventiona l panor ami c radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, O r a l R a d i o l o g y, a n d E n d o d o n t o l o g y. 2007;103(2):253-9.
33. Ghaeminia H, Meijer G, Soehardi A, Borstlap W, Mulder J, Vlijmen O, et al. The use of cone beam CTfor the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2011;40(8):834-9.
34. Jun S, Kim C, Ahn J, Padwa B, Kwon J. Anatomical differences in lower third molars visualized by 2D and 3D X-ray imaging: clinical outcomes after extraction. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2013;42(4):489–96.
35. Elkhateeb SM, Awad SS. Accuracy of panoramic radiographic predictor signs in the assessment of proximity of impacted third molars with the mandibular canal. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2018;13(3):254-61.
36. Peixoto LR, Gonzaga AKG, Melo SLS, dos Anjos Pontual ML, dos Anjos Pontual A, De Melo DP. The effect of two enhancement tools on the assessment of the relationship between third molars and the inferior alveolar canal. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015;43(5):637-42.
37. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Preoperative computed tomography imaging in the management of impacted mandibular third molars. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007;65(1):83-8.
38. Monaco G, Montevecchi M, Bonetti GA, Gatto MRA, Checchi L. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2004;135(3):312-8.
39. Rud J. Third molar surgery: relationship of root to mandibular canal and injuries to inferior dental nerve. Tandlaegebladet. 1983;87:619-31.
40. Owotade F, Fatusi O, Ibitoye B, Otuyemi O. Dental radiographic features of impacted third molars and some management implications. Odontostomatologie Tropicale= Tropical Dental Journal. 2003;26(103):9-14.
41. Huang CK, Lui MT, Cheng DH. Use of panoramic radiography to predict postsurgical sensory impairment following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2015;78(10):617-22. 42.
42.Nakamori K, Fujiwara K, Miyazaki A, Tomihara K, Tsuji M, Nakai M, et al. Clinical assessment of the relationship between the third molar and the inferior alveolar canal using panoramic images and computed tomography. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2008;66(11):2308-13.
43. FAUZI AA, NAZIMI AJ, RAMLI R, RASHDI MF FOUZI N, KAMARUDIN NA. Interruption Regions in the White Line: A Novel Panoramic Finding in the Risk Assessment of Mandibular Canal Exposure by Third Molar. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2019;13(4).
44. Pandey R, Ravindran C, Pandiyan D, Gupta A, Aggarwal A, Aryasri S. Assessment of Roods and Shehab criteria if one or more radiological signs are present in orthopantomogram and position of the mandibular canal in relation to the third molar apices using cone beam computed tomography: Aradiographic study. Tanta Dental Journal. 2018;15(1):33-8.
45. Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Hoshiba D, Kobayashi K, et al. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2007;65(7):1303-8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bernard Emeka Ogbozor , Mohammad Kaura Abubakar, Abdulmanan Yahaya , Sabir Iya , George O. Ewansiha , Khadija Bashir , Babatunde Olamide Bamgbose
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access Statement
- We became fully Open Access since January 2023.
- Our new and archived materials are available free of charge on open basis and under a Creative Commons license as stated below.
Copyright statement
Copyright © 1999 The authors. This work, Nigerian Dental Journal by Nigerian Dental Association is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
