The Effects of Intraoperative Povidone-Iodine and Normal Saline Irrigations on Postoperative Inflammatory Sequelae and Bleeding in Mandibular Third Molar Disimpactions: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61172/c4xvz716Keywords:
Povidone iodine, normal saline, irrigation, third-molar disimpactionAbstract
Background
Mandibular third molar disimpactions(M3-Disimpactions) is often associated with postoperative sequalae of pain, swelling, trismus and dysphagia1 which disturb patients’ Poor bone drilling efficiency and irrigation of the surgical site during M3-Disimpactions may worsen the postoperative morbidity and delay wound healing due to persistence of debris and devitalized bone fragments in the surgical site. It is therefore necessary to improve cutting efficiency and remove M3-Disimpaction site debris and devitalized tissues via copious irrigation and lavage to prevent worsening of the postoperative inflammatory sequelae.
Aim
The study aimed to compare the effects of Povidone iodine solution(PI) and normal saline(NS) irrigants on postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, and immediate postoperative bleeding(IPB) in M3-Disimpactionsn at the Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria(AKTH).
Methodology
The study was a randomized controlled study conducted among M3-Disimpaction patients who presented to the Oral surgery clinic of AKTH between May to November 2018. A sample size of 76 was calculated and convenience sampling was used to recruit subjects who were randomly assigned into a study group(SG) and a control group(CG). Each group comprised 38 subjects. The disimpaction irrigants were PI(0.5mg/ml solution) and NS in the SG and CG respectively. Immediate postoperative bleeding(IPB) was assessed for all disimpactions. Pain was assessed on postoperative days 1, 2 and 7(POD1, POD2 and POD7) while swelling and trismus were measured on POD2 and POD7. Statistical comparisons of outcome measures were done within and across groups with significance level set at p≤0.05.
Results
All recruited 38 subjects of each comparative group in the study completed the study. Each group had a similar M:F ratio of 1:1.3. Within-group analyses revealed that both PI and NS had significant effects on control of postoperative pain (PI: p=0.0001, NS: p=0.0001), swelling (PI: p=0.0001, NS: p=0.0001) and trismus (PI: p=0.0001, NS: p=0.001). Intergroup comparisons of outcome measures taken on POD1 ,POD2 and POD7 showed there were no significant differences in the means of postoperative pain scores (POD1: p=0.414, POD2: p=0.079, POD7: p=0.213), swelling measures (POD2: p=0.127, POD7: p=0.333 ) and Trismus values (POD2: p=0.599, POD7: p=0.566) of both groups. Mean IPB of both groups was significantly different (p=0.0001) with lower mean bleeding outcomes in the PI group.
Conclusion
PI and NS irrigations have similar significant effects on post-operative pain, swelling and trismus in M3-Disimpactions. However, PI has better haemostatic activity than NS. Clinicians should consider PI irrigation in M3-Disimpactions to reduce peri-operative bleeding.
Downloads
References
1. Seymour RA, Walton JG. Pain control after third molar surgery. Int J Oral Surg. 1984;13(6):457–8.
2. Ghaeminia H, oppenreijs TJ, Xi T, Fennis J, Maal T, Bergé S, et al. Postoperative socket irrigation with drinking tap water reduces the risk of inflammatory complications following surgical removal of third molars: a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(1):71–83.
3. Archampong EQ. Wounds and wound healing. In: Badoe E, Archampong E, da Rocha-Afodu J, editors. Principles and practice of surgery including pathology in the tropics. fourth. p. 57–69.
4. Wilkins RG, Unverdorben M. Wound cleaning and wound healing: A concise review. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013;26(4):160–3.
5. von Fraunhofer JA, Siegel SC, Feldman S. Handpiece coolant flow rates and dental cutting. Oper Dent. 2000;25(6):544–8.
6. König B, Reimer K, Fleischer W, König W. Effects of betaisodona on parameters of host defense. Dermatology. 1997;195(2):42–8.
7. Sweet J, Butler D, Drager J. Effects of lavage techniques with third molar. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1976;41(2):152–68.
8. Osunde OD, Adebola RA, Adeoye JB, Bassey GO. Comparative study of the effect of warm saline mouth rinse on complications after dental extractions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;43(5):649–53.
9. Arakeri G, Brennan PA. Povidone-iodine: An anti-oedematous agent?. 2011;40(2):173–6. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(2):173–6.
10. H MH, Mohammadi F, Hasheminasab M, A MH, Zahraei S, T MH. Effect of low-concentration povidone iodine on postoperative complications after third molar surgery: A pilot split-mouth study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(1):18–21.
11. Karsl ED, Erdogan Ö, Esen E, Acartürk E. Comparison of the effects of warfarin and heparin on bleeding caused by dental extraction: A clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(10):2500-7.
12. Roszkowski MT, Swift JQ, Hargreaves KM. Effect of NSAID administration on tissue levels of immunoreactive prostaglandin E2, leukotriene B4, and (S)-flurbiprofen following extraction of impacted third molars. Pain. 73(3):339–45.
13. Bamgbose BO, Akinwande JA, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Arotiba GT, Ogunlewe MO. Effects of co-administered dexamethasone and diclofenac potassium on pain, swelling and trismus following third molar surgery. Head Face Med. 1(11).
14. Ibikunle AA, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL. Effect of submucosal or oral administration of prednisolone on postoperative sequelae following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: A randomized controlled study. Niger Med J. 2016;57(5):272–9.
15. Aznar-Arasa L, Harutunian K, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Gay-Escoda C. Effect of preoperative ibuprofen on pain and swelling after lower third molar removal: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(8).
16. Schultze-Mosgau S, Schmelzeisen R, Frölich JC, Schmele H. Use of ibuprofen and methylprednisolone for the prevention of pain and swelling after removal of impacted third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(1):2–7.
17. Halpern LR DTB. Does prophylactic administration of systemic antibiotics prevent postoperative inflammatory complications after third Molar surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(2):177–85.
18. Oginni FO Assam E Ogunbodede EO UVI. Postoperative complaints following impacted mandibular third molar surgery in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. SADJ. 2002;57(7):264–8.
19. Akinwande JA. Mandibular third molar impaction- A comparison of two methods for predicting surgical difficulty. Niger Dental Journal. 1991;10(1):3–7.
20. Renton T, Smeeton N, Mcgurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J. 2001;190(11):607–10.
21. Bello SA, Adeyemo WL, Bamgbose BO, Obi E V, Adeyinka AA. Effect of age, impaction types and operative time on inflammatory tissue reactions following lower third molar surgery. Head Face Med. 2011;7(8):1–8.
22. Vinckier F, Vermylen J. Blood loss following dental extractions in anticoagulated rabbits: Effects of tranexamic acid and socket packing. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1985;59(1).
23. Kumar BPR, Maddi A, Ramesh K V., Baliga MJ, Rao SN, Meenakshi. Is povidone-iodine a hemostyptic?. A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(8).
24. Soodan KS, Iyer N, Priyadarshni P, Khajuria V. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine 2 % as hemostyptic agent in routine dental extraction. Int J Stomatol Occlusion Med. 2016;8(S1).
25. Connolly JC, Gilmore OJA. A study of the effect of povidone-iodine on polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis. Br J Exp Pathol. 1979;60(6).
26. Zamora JL. Chemical and microbiologic characteristics and toxicity of povidone-iodine solutions. Vol. 151, The American Journal of Surgery. 1986.
27. Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(6).
28. Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27(4).
29. Pederson GW. Surgical removal of tooth. In: Pederson GW, editor. Oral surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1988. In: Pederson GW, editor Oral surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1988.
30. Gbotolorun OM, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL. Assessment of Factors Associated With Surgical Difficulty in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(10):1977–83.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mustapha, Saheed Olawale, Suleiman, Abdul Rasheed, Abdullahi, Adam Sheikh Mohammed, Amole, Olushola Ibiyinka, Efunkoya, Akinwale Adeyemi, Omeje, Kelvin Uchenna
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access Statement
- We became fully Open Access since January 2023.
- Our new and archived materials are available free of charge on open basis and under a Creative Commons license as stated below.
Copyright statement
Copyright © 1999 The authors. This work, Nigerian Dental Journal by Nigerian Dental Association is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.