Repeatability of Instrumental Shade Matching Using Vita Easyshade Advance V Spectrophotometer

Authors

  • Gbenga Emmanuel Adebayo Federal medical centre Ebutemetta, Lagos
  • Temitope Olabisi Omosebi Lagos State University College of Medicine / Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos-state, Nigeria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61172/3mkf0195

Keywords:

repeatability, shade matching, instrumental, spectrophotometer

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the intra-device repeatability in tooth shade matching with the VITA Easy shade advance V spectrophotometer

Materials and Method: This is a cross-sectional clinical study. Twenty six teeth (Incisor-Premolar, being the aesthetic region) that met the selection criteria were included in the study. Spectrophotometric shade matchings of the teeth were done using VITA Easyshade advance V digital dental spectrophotometer. Three consecutive shade readings were taken by the device and recorded for each participant. Data collected was entered into personal computer spread sheet and analysis was done using IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software version 23. The statistical significance was set at <0.05.

Results: A total of twenty six (26) participants were recruited for the study. There were 11 (42.3%) males and 15 (57.7%) females. Half (50.0%) of the participants were aged 20-39 years. The first and second consecutive shades selected using the spectrophotometer were the same for 13 (50%) teeth. At the second and third consecutive shade selections, the instrument selected identical shades for 20 (76.9%) teeth. In addition, the same shades were recorded by the spectrophotometer for 17 (65.4%) at the first and third shade selection, while same shade reading were gotten for 12 (46.2%) three consecutive times. There were none of the cases in which all the three shade selected by the spectrophotometer differed. Intra-device reliability for the three consecutive reading measured with Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0.39.

Conclusions: Instrumental tooth shade matching with VITA Easy shade advance V spectrophotometer enabled repeatable measurement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jouhar, R., Ahmed, M.A., Heboyan, A. et al. Analysis of shade-matching ability in dental students: a comparative study under clinical and correcting light conditions. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:169-174.

Sîmpălean D, Petrişor M, Măruşteri MS, Ghiga D, Bacârea V, Calinici T, et al. A software application to detect dental colour. Applied Medical Informatics. 2015;37:31-38.

Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental colour matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38:2-16.

Chittem J, Sajjan GS, Varma Kanumuri M. Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Colour Stability of Nano Hybrid Composite Resin in Commonly Used Food Colourants in Asian Countries. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZC61-ZC65.

Antony, Jesmy K.; George, Liza; Mathew, Josey. Assessment of shade matching using visual and instrumental methods: An In vivo study. The Saint's International Dental Journal.2021;5:37-41.

Farhad T, Elaheh B, Parisa A, Saied E. Visual and digital tooth shade selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: A literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;1–21.

Alshiddi I, Richards L. A comparison of conventional visual andspectrophotometric shade taking by trained and untraineddental students. Australian Dental Journal 2015; 60:176–181

Ali A, Isra'a A. Accuracy of Two Electronic Dental Spectrophotometers. Journal of international Dental and Medical Research. 2021;14:554-558

Floriani, F.; Jurado, C.A.; Abuhammoud, S.; Vargas, M.; Fischer, N.G.; Rojas-Rueda, S.; Lopes, G.C. A Comparative Study of Shade-Matching Reproducibility Using an Intraoral Scanner and a Spectrophotometer. Dent. J. 2024, 12, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12030062

Knezović D, Zlatarić D, Illeš IŽ, Alajbeg M. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of repeatability and accuracy of VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 dental shade-matching device. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015;49:112-118.

Anand D, Kumar S, Anand Y, Sundar M, Sharma R. Shade selection : spectrophotometer vs digital camera–a comparative in-vitro study. Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2016;2:73–78.

Kalantari M, Ahmad S, Mohaghegh M. Evaluation of accuracy of shade selection using two spectrophotometer systems : Vita Easyshade and Degudent Shadepilot. Eur J Dent. 2017;11:196–200.

Rizwan J, Muhammad A, Zoaib K. An Overview of Shade Selection in Clinical Dentistry. Applied Sciences. 2022;12:6841.

Ebeid K, Sabet A. Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral scanners on shade determination. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34:988-993

Gehrke P. Comparison of in vivo visual, Spectrophotometric and Colorimetric shade determination of teeth and implant-supported crowns. Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12:1–17.

Paul S, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N. Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison. Int J Perio Res Dent. 2004;24:222–231.

Okubo S, Kanawati A, Richards M, Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:642-648.

Igiel C. Reliability of visual and instrumental colour matching. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29:303–308.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-19

How to Cite

Repeatability of Instrumental Shade Matching Using Vita Easyshade Advance V Spectrophotometer. (2025). Nigerian Dental Journal, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.61172/3mkf0195